Selecting an appropriately sized trash bin can significantly impact both usability and space efficiency in homes and commercial settings. The physical dimensions of different capacity bins—particularly their footprint and height—directly affect placement options and daily functionality.
This analysis examines three standard bin sizes offered by Recology: 32-gallon, 64-gallon, and 96-gallon models. Each specification is broken down by length, width, and height to facilitate informed decision-making.
Recology also provides smaller 16-gallon and 20-gallon variants. The 16-gallon model measures 23.75 × 18.50 × 36.50 inches, while the 20-gallon version shares the 32-gallon bin's base dimensions with a 2-inch taller lid to accommodate a specialized 20-gallon liner.
Understanding these dimensional differences enables consumers to select bins that optimize waste management efficiency without compromising living or working spaces. Proper sizing considerations prevent common issues such as overflow, difficult handling, or inefficient use of available area.
Selecting an appropriately sized trash bin can significantly impact both usability and space efficiency in homes and commercial settings. The physical dimensions of different capacity bins—particularly their footprint and height—directly affect placement options and daily functionality.
This analysis examines three standard bin sizes offered by Recology: 32-gallon, 64-gallon, and 96-gallon models. Each specification is broken down by length, width, and height to facilitate informed decision-making.
Recology also provides smaller 16-gallon and 20-gallon variants. The 16-gallon model measures 23.75 × 18.50 × 36.50 inches, while the 20-gallon version shares the 32-gallon bin's base dimensions with a 2-inch taller lid to accommodate a specialized 20-gallon liner.
Understanding these dimensional differences enables consumers to select bins that optimize waste management efficiency without compromising living or working spaces. Proper sizing considerations prevent common issues such as overflow, difficult handling, or inefficient use of available area.